{
  "schema": "unitiqx.orbit.public-work-batch.v1",
  "declassified_at_utc": "2026-10-11T08:53:50.249265+00:00",
  "jobs_count": 4,
  "all_complete": true,
  "parallel_runner_slots": 3,
  "serialized_model_inference_slots": 1,
  "tasks": [
    {
      "task": "enterprise-questions",
      "recipe": "question_pack",
      "state": "complete",
      "completed_utc": "2026-10-11T08:40:12+00:00",
      "receipt_source": "private SQLite queue; declassified public output, immutable receipt ID withheld",
      "evidence_type": "actual executed deterministic rule or actual serialized local Ollama inference",
      "result": {
        "count": 100,
        "topic": "Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates",
        "questions": [
          {
            "theme": "architecture",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "architecture",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "architecture",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "architecture",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "architecture",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "interface",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "interface",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "interface",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "interface",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "interface",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "security",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "security",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "security",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "security",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "security",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "correctness",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "correctness",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "correctness",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "correctness",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "correctness",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "mobility",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "mobility",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "mobility",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "mobility",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "mobility",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "research",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "research",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "research",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "research",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "research",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "model quality",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "model quality",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "model quality",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "model quality",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "model quality",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "documentation",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "documentation",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "documentation",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "documentation",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "documentation",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "accessibility",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "accessibility",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "accessibility",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "accessibility",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "accessibility",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "performance",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "performance",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "performance",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "performance",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "performance",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "recovery",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "recovery",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "recovery",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "recovery",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "recovery",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "data governance",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "data governance",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "data governance",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "data governance",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "data governance",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "public trust",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "public trust",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "public trust",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "public trust",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "public trust",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "education",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "education",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "education",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "education",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "education",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "design",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "design",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "design",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "design",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "design",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "operations",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "operations",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "operations",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "operations",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "operations",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "cost control",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "cost control",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "cost control",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "cost control",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "cost control",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "multi-provider",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "multi-provider",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "multi-provider",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "multi-provider",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "multi-provider",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "tests",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "tests",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "tests",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "tests",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "tests",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "content",
            "question": "What is missing from Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the current implementation?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "content",
            "question": "Which assumptions must be proven for Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the most important workflow?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "content",
            "question": "How would you benchmark Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in mobile users?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "content",
            "question": "What is the smallest valuable improvement to Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in the release gate?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          },
          {
            "theme": "content",
            "question": "Which failure mode threatens Enterprise suites, installers, sign-in architecture, reusable modules, evidence receipts and release gates in offline continuity?",
            "acceptance": "Record baseline, exact assertion, independent evidence and rollback"
          }
        ],
        "algorithm": "deterministic 20 areas × 5 questions; no commercial LLM claimed"
      }
    },
    {
      "task": "transport-research",
      "recipe": "transport_query",
      "state": "complete",
      "completed_utc": "2026-10-11T08:40:13+00:00",
      "receipt_source": "private SQLite queue; declassified public output, immutable receipt ID withheld",
      "evidence_type": "actual executed deterministic rule or actual serialized local Ollama inference",
      "result": {
        "query": "walking crawling sleigh bicycle ship hovercraft submersible aircraft orbital rocket future spacecraft",
        "matches": 146,
        "records": [
          {
            "id": "0d9e91533a56",
            "name": "suborbital rocket",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "f71be0557fb9",
            "name": "orbital refueling architecture",
            "category": "Spacecraft development",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "modern/experimental",
            "evidence": "experimental",
            "propulsion": "rocket/electric/nuclear-concept",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Experimental or prototype-level concept; availability and performance depend on a specific design.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "5da880ac9daf",
            "name": "orbital transfer vehicle",
            "category": "Spacecraft current",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket/solar-electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of spacecraft current.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "6af52d9f9799",
            "name": "air-launched rocket",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "24ab535cec7a",
            "name": "airship city transport concept",
            "category": "Speculative water and air",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "future speculative",
            "evidence": "speculative",
            "propulsion": "electric/hydrogen/hybrid",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Conceptual transport idea; technical feasibility and commercialization are not established.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "801825d4908e",
            "name": "cargo spacecraft",
            "category": "Spacecraft current",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket/solar-electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of spacecraft current.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "d99e9e28502c",
            "name": "expendable orbital launch vehicle",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "caee62c916d1",
            "name": "fully electric intercontinental aircraft concept",
            "category": "Speculative water and air",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "future speculative",
            "evidence": "speculative",
            "propulsion": "electric/hydrogen/hybrid",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Conceptual transport idea; technical feasibility and commercialization are not established.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "bdd398d93b62",
            "name": "heavy-lift rocket",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "3a3f2793ccfe",
            "name": "ion-propelled spacecraft",
            "category": "Spacecraft current",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket/solar-electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of spacecraft current.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "55dcdeb236e6",
            "name": "nuclear thermal rocket concept",
            "category": "Spacecraft development",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "modern/experimental",
            "evidence": "experimental",
            "propulsion": "rocket/electric/nuclear-concept",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Experimental or prototype-level concept; availability and performance depend on a specific design.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "b6493a54f3f8",
            "name": "orbital skyhook",
            "category": "Conceptual megastructures",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "future speculative",
            "evidence": "speculative",
            "propulsion": "mechanical/magnetic",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Conceptual transport idea; technical feasibility and commercialization are not established.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "fb09b172a0d6",
            "name": "reusable first-stage rocket",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "c4298fb608dc",
            "name": "satellite servicing spacecraft",
            "category": "Spacecraft current",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket/solar-electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of spacecraft current.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "dc22f6261501",
            "name": "sounding rocket",
            "category": "Orbital launch",
            "environment": "space",
            "era": "space age",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rocket",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of orbital launch.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "8dcda3af30df",
            "name": "STOL aircraft",
            "category": "Powered aviation",
            "environment": "air",
            "era": "modern",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "propeller/turbine/electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of powered aviation.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "384bfe7b0ea0",
            "name": "all-terrain hovercraft",
            "category": "Amphibious and hybrid",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "mixed",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of amphibious and hybrid.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "4a2851b244e1",
            "name": "amphibious aircraft",
            "category": "Amphibious and hybrid",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "mixed",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of amphibious and hybrid.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "399af6669612",
            "name": "autonomous cargo ship trial",
            "category": "Novel commercial demonstrations",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "modern/experimental",
            "evidence": "experimental",
            "propulsion": "electric/mixed",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Experimental or prototype-level concept; availability and performance depend on a specific design.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "b1f8c60ff0f6",
            "name": "bear crawling",
            "category": "Human motion",
            "environment": "land",
            "era": "all eras",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "biological",
            "kind": "movement",
            "description": "A classified example of human motion.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "6b76b42ec2f9",
            "name": "belly crawling",
            "category": "Human motion",
            "environment": "land",
            "era": "all eras",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "biological",
            "kind": "movement",
            "description": "A classified example of human motion.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "bf592e0ca055",
            "name": "bicycle taxi",
            "category": "Bicycles",
            "environment": "land",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "human/electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of bicycles.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "81965753156b",
            "name": "biological living airship",
            "category": "Science fiction water and air",
            "environment": "multimodal",
            "era": "fictional",
            "evidence": "fictional",
            "propulsion": "imaginary",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "Fictional or imaginary mobility concept, not a proven real-world vehicle.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "2f20a0f5beca",
            "name": "cable-laying ship",
            "category": "Water freight and work",
            "environment": "water",
            "era": "modern",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "diesel/electric/hybrid",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of water freight and work.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "8e48c96eeaa4",
            "name": "cargo bicycle",
            "category": "Bicycles",
            "environment": "land",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "human/electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of bicycles.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "e0a8542c62a2",
            "name": "clipper ship",
            "category": "Sail and wind",
            "environment": "water",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "wind",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of sail and wind.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "782efb527485",
            "name": "container ship",
            "category": "Water freight and work",
            "environment": "water",
            "era": "modern",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "diesel/electric/hybrid",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of water freight and work.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "a6e67fd06027",
            "name": "crawling",
            "category": "Human motion",
            "environment": "land",
            "era": "all eras",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "biological",
            "kind": "movement",
            "description": "A classified example of human motion.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "0f5e6d467eeb",
            "name": "cruise ship",
            "category": "Water passenger",
            "environment": "water",
            "era": "historical to present",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "diesel/electric/hybrid",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of water passenger.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          },
          {
            "id": "c970adb8843d",
            "name": "eVTOL test aircraft",
            "category": "Vertical flight",
            "environment": "air",
            "era": "modern",
            "evidence": "established",
            "propulsion": "rotor/turbine/electric",
            "kind": "mobility technology",
            "description": "A classified example of vertical flight.",
            "verification": "curated taxonomy; individual technical specifications and historical dates require independent sources"
          }
        ],
        "total_catalog": 595,
        "method": "tagged taxonomy"
      }
    },
    {
      "task": "public-route-audit",
      "recipe": "site_audit",
      "state": "complete",
      "completed_utc": "2026-10-11T08:40:12+00:00",
      "receipt_source": "private SQLite queue; declassified public output, immutable receipt ID withheld",
      "evidence_type": "actual executed deterministic rule or actual serialized local Ollama inference",
      "result": {
        "checked": 24,
        "http_200": 24,
        "rows": [
          {
            "path": "/frontiers/live/",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/review-lab/report.json",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/voice-studio/conversation.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/beat-bloom/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/frontiers/live/projects.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/suites/atlas.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/suites/",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/launch/",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/frontiers/defaults-extensions.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/suites/continuity.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/matrix-arcade/mindplay.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/simworks/lab.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/nebula-dodge/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/civic-nexus/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/arcade/",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/matrix-campaign/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/routemind-ai/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/sphynx-arcade/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/sphynx-casino/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/matrix-arcade/index.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/demos/matrix-arcade/guide.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/commons/guide.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/planes/redundancy.html",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          },
          {
            "path": "/atlas/",
            "http": 200,
            "ok": true
          }
        ],
        "note": "HTTP status only, not browser functional parity"
      }
    },
    {
      "task": "multi-model-benchmark",
      "recipe": "benchmark",
      "state": "complete",
      "completed_utc": "2026-10-11T08:40:21+00:00",
      "receipt_source": "private SQLite queue; declassified public output, immutable receipt ID withheld",
      "evidence_type": "actual executed deterministic rule or actual serialized local Ollama inference",
      "result": {
        "task": "fixed structured JSON compliance",
        "results": [
          {
            "model": "qwen3:0.6b",
            "wall_s": 2.09,
            "json_exact_pass": true,
            "chars": 31,
            "tokens_generated": 11,
            "tokens_prompt": 34,
            "think": false
          },
          {
            "model": "llama3.2:1b",
            "wall_s": 3.15,
            "json_exact_pass": true,
            "chars": 31,
            "tokens_generated": 11,
            "tokens_prompt": 43,
            "think": false
          },
          {
            "model": "qwen2.5:1.5b",
            "wall_s": 4.02,
            "json_exact_pass": true,
            "chars": 40,
            "tokens_generated": 17,
            "tokens_prompt": 47,
            "think": false
          }
        ],
        "passed": 3,
        "tested": 3,
        "scope": "one deterministic prompt; insufficient to establish intelligence or overall model ranking"
      }
    }
  ],
  "scope": "No arbitrary shell, private documents, vendor API or unreviewed deployment was performed.",
  "factory_candidate": {
    "title": "UNITIQX Enterprise Service Capacity Planner",
    "state": "awaiting_approval",
    "published": false,
    "evidence": "Actual Factory OS deterministic candidate build, Node validation, documentation and private package; private source not disclosed."
  }
}